Survey Results - 2024 SCSA PST Adjustments Survey

1. Rate your level of agreement with the following aspects of the proposed PST methodology:


Total Votes 0 100%
1a. Maximum adjustment of 0.25 seconds per stage

Strongly Disagree 126 20.55%
Disagree 64 10.44%
Neutral 147 23.98%
Agree 155 25.29%
Strongly Agree 121 19.74%
Total Votes 613 100%
1b. Maximum adjustment of 2.0 seconds per division

Strongly Disagree 169 28.26%
Disagree 84 14.05%
Neutral 127 21.24%
Agree 124 20.74%
Strongly Agree 94 15.72%
Total Votes 598 100%
1c. Using raw counts of shooters exceeding PST as the primary metric

Strongly Disagree 168 29.37%
Disagree 93 16.26%
Neutral 169 29.55%
Agree 113 19.76%
Strongly Agree 29 5.07%
Total Votes 572 100%
2. When adjusting PSTs, which approach do you support?

Only reducing times 23 3.96%
Only increasing times 19 3.27%
Both increasing and reducing times based on data 233 40.1%
No adjustments without broader classification system review 306 52.67%
Total Votes 581 100%

3. How would you rate the following aspects of the PST adjustment process:


Total Votes 0 100%
3a. Clarity of methodology

Poor 242 42.76%
Fair 165 29.15%
Good 120 21.2%
Very Good 25 4.42%
Excellent 14 2.47%
Total Votes 566 100%
3b. Availability of supporting data

Poor 224 40.36%
Fair 159 28.65%
Good 123 22.16%
Very Good 34 6.13%
Excellent 15 2.7%
Total Votes 555 100%
3c. Communication of proposed changes

Poor 227 40.54%
Fair 145 25.89%
Good 135 24.11%
Very Good 38 6.79%
Excellent 15 2.68%
Total Votes 560 100%
3d. Opportunity for member input

Poor 193 34.77%
Fair 134 24.14%
Good 151 27.21%
Very Good 53 9.55%
Excellent 24 4.32%
Total Votes 555 100%
Additional Comments

Total Votes 0 100%